A conversation among equals for the radicalization of democracy: a review on Roberto Gargarella’s work

Authors

Keywords:

Democracies, Public dialogue, Constitutional reform, Counter–hegemony, Utopia, Public participation, Xenofeminisms, Precarity

Abstract

In his latest publication, El derecho como una conversación entre iguales (2021), Roberto Gargarella traces a fundamental guide to understand why today’s democracies are unable to represent current social demands. Hesustains that the constitutional designs in Latinoamérica have historically displaced People’s self–management of collective conflicts. His genealogical analysis of national and regional institutions reveals that Republics have been rooted in counter–majoritarian values and over fears of popular participation in public affairs. This article seeks to highlight the salient points of Gargarella’s theory and proposes some intersections with contemporary theories on democracies to problematize our current opportunities to re–design present and future life in common.

Author Biography

Paula Sagel, Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina)

Abogada, Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Magíster en Derecho (LL.M, Cardozo School of Law). Becaria doctoral (CONICET–UBA). Profesora de Derecho Constitucional (UBA). Miembro de la Red de Profesoras de la Facultad de Derecho (UBA).

Downloads

Published

2022-06-09

How to Cite

Sagel, P. (2022). A conversation among equals for the radicalization of democracy: a review on Roberto Gargarella’s work. República Y Derecho, 7(7), 1–22. Retrieved from https://ojs3.derecho.uncu.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/247

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 7 (2022): Vol. 7, N° 7 (2022): (Continuous publication) Dossier: Constitution and Democracy. Reflections on "Law as a conversation between equals" by Roberto Gargarella

Section

Dossier

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Paula Sagel

The authors who publish on this journal agree the following terms:

1. Authors guarantee that this is the first publication of the work and that it is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR) which allows others to share the work recognizing the authorship and the initial publication on this journal.

2. Authors may establish additional agreements to non-exclusive distribution of the published work with a recognition of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Articles may be compiled for its publication in books or to be saved in an institutional repository, or personal web page newer than the publication in the Journal.